Norman Fwamba

The Mistake Every Developer Makes (And No One Talks About)

The Mistake Every Developer Makes (And No One Talks About)

The Silent Trap Every Developer Falls Into (And How to Escape It)

#programming #tutorial #productivity #career

If you’re a developer, I’m 99% sure you’ve fallen into this trap. In fact, you don’t even have to be a senior or junior dev—just someone who writes code.

No, I’m not talking about forgetting a semicolon in JavaScript or trying to run docker-compose up without Docker installed (who hasn’t?).

I’m talking about overcomplicating everything.


“I Just Made It Worse” - The Developer’s Secret Shame

Raise your hand if this sounds familiar:
✅ Spent 8 hours “optimizing” code that worked perfectly
✅ Created 5 new abstract classes for “future flexibility”
✅ Ended up with 3x more code than you started with

Welcome to overengineering hell - where 72% of developers admit to self-sabotaging their projects through unnecessary complexity (2023 Stack Overflow Survey).


The Problem: The “It Could Be Better” Curse

Have you ever had that brilliant idea to refactor some code? Something that would turn a 200-line monster into a 20-line masterpiece? You get excited, start working on it, and suddenly…

  • Your code now uses three design patterns you saw on YouTube.
  • Your PR has more comments than lines of code.
  • No one (not even you) understands what was done.
  • The bug you wanted to fix is still there.

Welcome to overengineering—a problem developers love to create for themselves.



Why Do We Do This?

1. Because we want to be “good devs”

Who hasn’t tried to prove they’re an amazing programmer by shoving in a Factory Pattern where a simple if statement would do? It feels like an achievement to make something elegant, but elegance should never come at the cost of clarity and maintainability.

2. Because we just learned something new and want to apply it

“I just learned about CQRS, let me use it to separate handlers in a login form!” (Don’t do this.)

New knowledge is exciting, but not every problem requires a cutting-edge solution. Many times, simpler approaches would work just as well or better.

3. Because we hate ugly code

Sometimes, “ugly” code just works. And that’s okay. Not every function needs to be a work of art. If it’s readable, efficient, and does its job well, then it’s good enough. Striving for perfection can slow you down and introduce unnecessary complexity.

4. Because we fear “too simple” code

We think simple code means “inexperienced” code. In reality, simplicity is a sign of maturity. Writing concise, clear, and effective code should always be the goal. Senior developers understand that unnecessary complexity is a future maintenance nightmare.

5. Because we equate complexity with intelligence

It’s easy to assume that more sophisticated code equals smarter coding. But real intelligence lies in breaking down problems into the simplest solutions possible. A truly great developer writes code that others can understand and maintain without needing a Ph.D. in computer science.


Expert Insight:

“Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.”
- Brian Kernighan, Co-author of The C Programming Language


The Complexity Audit: 5 Questions That Will Save Your Project

Before adding any new pattern/library/abstraction, ask:

  1. 🔍 The Maintenance Test
    “Will this still make sense to me at 3 AM during an outage?”

  2. The Time Machine Challenge
    “If I showed this to myself from 6 months ago, would I understand it?”

  3. 📉 The ROI Evaluation
    “What measurable improvement does this actually provide?”

  4. 🧑💻 The Team Impact Check
    “Does everyone understand this pattern, or am I creating tribal knowledge?”

  5. 🚨 The Production Reality
    “Is this solving an actual problem we have today?”


How to Avoid This Trap

1. Write first, refactor later.

Want to clean up the code? Great! But first, solve the problem. Getting a working solution should be the first priority before introducing any optimizations.

2. Ask: does this really improve anything?

If the answer is “because it looks nicer” rather than “because it solves a real problem,” it might not be worth it. Every refactor should have a clear benefit beyond aesthetics.

3. Remember KISS and YAGNI.

Keep It Simple, Stupid (KISS) and You Ain’t Gonna Need It (YAGNI). Simplicity saves headaches. The best code is often the simplest code that effectively meets the requirements.

4. Seek feedback.

Before diving into a major refactor, ask for opinions. A colleague might save you from going down a rabbit hole. A second set of eyes often provides valuable perspective on whether your approach is practical.

5. Document your decisions.

If you really need a complex solution, explain why. Code without context becomes a nightmare. Documenting the reasoning behind architectural decisions will help future developers (and yourself) understand why things were done a certain way.

6. Recognize when “good enough” is actually good enough

Not every piece of code needs to be a masterpiece. If it works, is maintainable, and doesn’t introduce unnecessary complexity, then it’s good enough. Learn to accept that not everything has to be optimized to the nth degree.


From Overengineering to Zen Engineering: A 4-Step Detox Plan

Step 1: Implement the “Walking Skeleton” Approach

  1. Build the simplest possible working version
  2. Then add complexity only when proven necessary

Step 2: Adopt the 30-Minute Rule

⏳ If you can’t explain your architecture decision in plain English within 30 minutes, it’s too complex.

Step 3: Practice Strategic Code Vandalism

💥 Intentionally break your system to prove which abstractions are actually valuable.

Step 4: Maintain a Complexity Journal

📔 Log every abstraction decision with:

  • Problem statement
  • Considered alternatives
  • Expected benefits
  • Measurable outcomes

Your Challenge This Week

  1. Find one “clever” piece of code you wrote
  2. Remove 30% of the code while maintaining functionality
  3. Share the results with your team

“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.”
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry